The conflict between treatment optimization and registration of radiopharmaceuticals with fixed activity posology in oncological nuclear medicine therapy - Centre de recherche en cancérologie Nantes-Angers Unité Mixte de Recherche 892 Inserm - 6299 CNRS Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Année : 2017

The conflict between treatment optimization and registration of radiopharmaceuticals with fixed activity posology in oncological nuclear medicine therapy

Résumé

The “intended purpose” in all therapeutic exposures is treatment efficacy against malignant disease. The optimization principle (as low as reasonably achievable, ALARA) of article 56, when applied in a therapy situation, states that absorbed doses to nontarget tissues should be kept reasonably low, but not so low as to lose efficacy. We think that this applies above all to the fight against life-threatening cancer. As a consequence, we believe that to adhere to the optimization principle in oncological patients, nuclear medicine therapy should be based on individualized dosimetry.

Domaines

Cancer

Dates et versions

hal-02379748 , version 1 (25-11-2019)

Identifiants

Citer

C. Chiesa, K. Sjogreen Gleisner, G. Flux, J. Gear, S. Walrand, et al.. The conflict between treatment optimization and registration of radiopharmaceuticals with fixed activity posology in oncological nuclear medicine therapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2017, 44 (11), pp.1783-1786. ⟨10.1007/s00259-017-3707-3⟩. ⟨hal-02379748⟩
29 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More