How can model comparison help improving species distribution models?

Emmanuel Gritti (1, 2) , Cedric Gaucherel (3, 4) , Maria-Veronica Crespo-Perez (2) , Isabelle Chuine (2)

1 UMR SYSTEM - Fonctionnement et conduite des systèmes de culture tropicaux et méditerranéens
2 CEFE - Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive
3 UMR AMAP - Botanique et Modélisation de l'Architecture des Plantes et des Végétations
4 IFP - Institut Français de Pondichéry

Today, more than ever, robust projections of potential species range shifts are needed to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of climate change on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Such projections are so far provided almost exclusively by correlative species distribution models (correlative SDMs). However, concerns regarding the reliability of their predictive power are growing and several authors call for the development of process-based SDMs. Still, each of these methods presents strengths and weakness which have to be estimated if they are to be reliably used by decision makers. In this study we compare projections of three different SDMs (STASH, LPJ and PHENOFIT) that lie in the continuum between correlative models and process-based models for the current distribution of three major European tree species, Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus robur L. and Pinus sylvestris L. We compare the consistency of the model simulations using an innovative comparison map profile method, integrating local and multi-scale comparisons. The three models simulate relatively accurately the current distribution of the three species. The process-based model performs almost as well as the correlative model, although parameters of the former are not fitted to the observed species distributions. According to our simulations, species range limits are triggered, at the European scale, by establishment and survival through processes primarily related to phenology and resistance to abiotic stress rather than to growth efficiency. The accuracy of projections of the hybrid and process-based model could however be improved by integrating a more realistic representation of the species resistance to water stress for instance, advocating for pursuing efforts to understand and formulate explicitly the impact of climatic conditions and variations on these processes.

Mots clés: vulnerability; niche; ecosystems; uncertainty; range shifts; fagus-sylvatica l.; plant functional types; climate-change impacts; vegetation dynamics; adaptive evolution

Domaines: Milieux et Changements globaux; Sciences de la Terre

Emmanuel Gritti, Cedric Gaucherel, Maria-Veronica Crespo-Perez, Isabelle Chuine. How can model comparison help improving species distribution models?. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8 (7), ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0068823⟩. ⟨hal-01190747⟩