M. Akrich, Les objets techniques et leurs utilisateurs, de la conception à l'action. Raisons pratiques, pp.35-57, 1993.
DOI : 10.4000/books.pressesmines.1198
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00081731

A. Arborio, observation directe en sociologie: quelques réflexions méthodologiques à partir de travaux de recherches sur le terrain hospitalier, Recherche en soins infirmiers, issue.90, pp.26-34, 2007.
DOI : 10.3917/rsi.090.0026

A. Arborio and P. Fournier, L'observation directe: L'enquête et ses méthodes, 2010.

A. Bauman, H. Fardy, and P. Harris, Challenges for improving patients' experiences of health care

S. Beaud, L'usage de l'entretien en sciences sociales. Plaidoyer pour l'??entretien ethnographique??, Politix, vol.9, issue.35, pp.226-227, 1996.
DOI : 10.3406/polix.1996.1966

M. Callon, Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, in Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge, pp.196-223, 1986.

F. Cooren, The Communicative Achievement of Collective Minding: Analysis of Board Meeting Excerpts, Management Communication Quarterly, vol.17, issue.4, pp.17-517, 2004.
DOI : 10.1177/0893318903262242

F. Cooren, The Organizational World as a Plenum of Agencies, in Communication as Organizing: Empirical and Theoretical Approaches to the Dynamic of Text and Conversation

F. Cooren, Ventriloquie, performativité et communication Ou comment fait-on parler les choses, Réseaux, issue.163, pp.2010-2044
DOI : 10.3917/res.163.0033

D. Geneviève, Paroles de déments parole aux déments, pp.111-128, 2003.

N. Dodier, Les Hommes et les machines: La Conscience collective dans les sociétés technicisées, 1995.
DOI : 10.3917/meta.dodie.1995.01

Y. Engeström, Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, pp.Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139814744

G. Fairhurst and F. Cooren, Organizational Language in Use: Interaction Analysis, Conversation Analysis and Speech Act Schematics, in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse, pp.131-153, 2004.

A. Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology, 1967.

S. Grosjean, Saisir la dynamique organisationnelle: quand intersubjectivité et interobjectivité s'entrelacent, Sciences de la Société, issue.74, pp.43-63, 2008.

L. Honoré, Travail en situation et prise en compte du risque??: le cas des services de r??animation n??onatale, Management & Avenir, vol.75, issue.1, pp.2015-89
DOI : 10.3917/mav.075.0089

B. Journé, Collecter les données par l'observation, in Méthodologie de la recherche en sciences de gestion, Réussir son mémoire ou sa thèse

B. Journé, Raulet-Croset N. Le concept de situation: Contribution à l'analyse de l'activité managériale dans un context d'ambiguïté et d'incertitude. M@n@gement, pp.27-55, 2008.

T. Laporte and P. Consolini, Working in Practice but Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of " High- Reliability Organizations, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol.1, issue.1, pp.19-47, 1991.

B. Latour, On Interobjectivity, Mind, Culture, and Activity, vol.3, issue.4, pp.228-245, 1996.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2

B. Latour, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies, 2005.

A. Mucchielli, Psychologie de la communication, 1995.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.mucch.1995.01

W. Orlikowski and S. Scott, Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization. The Academy of Management Annals, pp.433-474, 2008.

A. Piette, Ethnographie de l'action, L'observation des détails, 1996.

G. Rochlin, T. L. Porte, and K. Roberts, The Self-Designing High-Reliability Organization: Aircraft Carrier Flight Operations at Sea. Naval War College Review, pp.76-90, 1987.

D. Schoeneborn, The Three Schools of CCO Thinking: Interactive Dialogue and Systematic Comparison, Management Communication Quarterly, vol.28, issue.2, pp.285-316, 2014.
DOI : 10.1177/0893318914527000

C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, 1949.

S. Star, Ceci n'est pas un objet-frontière! Réflexions sur l'origine d'un concept. Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances, pp.18-35, 2010.

M. Stewart, Towards a global definition of patient centred care, BMJ, vol.322, issue.7284, pp.444-445, 2001.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444

S. Tillement, C. Cholez, and T. Reverdy, Assessing organizational resilience: An interactionist approach. M@n@gement, pp.230-265, 2009.
DOI : 10.3917/mana.124.0230
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00484101

J. Van-maanen, Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, 0190.
DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226849638.001.0001

T. Vogus, K. Sutcliffe, and K. Weick, Doing no harm: Enabling, enacting, and elaborating a culture of safety in health care, Academy of Management Perspectives, pp.60-77, 2010.

K. Weick and K. Roberts, Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.38, issue.3, pp.357-381, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/2393372

K. E. Weick and K. M. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. 2 nd Edition, 2007.
DOI : 10.1002/9781119175834

R. Yin, The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.26, issue.1, pp.58-65, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/2392599
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.464.7613